Skip to content
עברית
Français
Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs (JCFA)
Strategic Alliances for a Secure, Connected, and Prosperous Region
Menu
Home
About Us
About Us
Our Experts
Board of Fellows
Our Building
Programs
The JCFA Center for Security, Diplomacy, and Communications
Arab-Israel-Africa National Security Partnerships
Initiative for Palestinian Authority Accountability and Reform
Exposing Political Antisemitism and Combating Delegitimization
Black American-Israel Leadership Initiative
Institute for Contemporary Affairs
For Students and Interns
Past Programs
Defensible Borders for Israel
Jerusalem in International Diplomacy
Anti-Semitism in Canada
Publications
Authors
Major Studies
Analysis
Jerusalem Issue Briefs
Jerusalem Viewpoints
Strategic Perspectives
Global Law Forum
Special Reports
Daily Alert
Jewish Political Studies Review
Post-Holocaust and Anti-Semitism
Daniel Elazar Library
Major Knesset Debates
Israel’s Wars
Maps
Jewish Environmental Studies
Survey of Arab Affairs
Jerusalem Letter
Homeland Security Portal
Jerusalem Studies
ebooks
Other Special Features
Podcast
Videos
New Videos
YouTube
Audio Archive
Conferences
Blog
Support Us
Contact Us
Search for:
Home
Current:
Study
Study
Religion and Modernity in Our Day
April 20, 1996
In this essay a comparison is proposed between the positions of Jewish Orthodoxy in modernistic Western society before and after World War II. It is assumed that the differences arise as a result of major changes in the cultural nature of modernity. The differences are defined, and it is then claimed that they have led to a radical change in the role of all the Jewish modern Orthodox movements. (As a specifically successful example of integration between Orthodoxy and modernity before the war, the changing role of the religious kibbutz movement is particularly examined.)
The Use and Abuse of the Bible in Spinoza’s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus by Harvey Shulman
April 25, 1995
The Tractatus Theologico-Politicus is Spinoza's great work directing us to his view of the superiority of the political-secular jurisdiction of the state over its religious dimension. For Spinoza, biblical exegesis and hermeneutics were autonomous scholarly endeavors, separate from traditional biblical homiletics. His theological political approach leads him to hone and explicate the prophetic texts for their secular and political implications, undermining the belief that a definitive sacred history took precedence over the secular narrative. The Bible becomes a vehicle for affirming, or refuting, political interests, historically, and for Spinoza's own time. Through his biblical commentary, Spinoza articulates a commitment to a secular, liberal, republican politics, where philosophers have the security and freedom to reflect on ideas, free from any religious dogma and interference. Spinoza's use and abuse of the Bible are also an indictment of two millennia of Jewish scholarship and faith, and also implicitly undermines Christian beliefs about Christ's divinity and sacred dogma.