Alerts

To Respond or Not to Respond: Is That the Real Question?

Psychological insights into Iranian behavior
Share this
Cartoon
Cartoon by Amjad Rasmi, April 14, 2024. (Arab News/Asharq Al-Awsat)

Table of Contents

  • In light of the Iranian attack on Israel, a debate is underway on whether or not Israel should respond. What is missing in the discussion is the fact that the Iranian attack is, in fact, a “response” to a presumed Israeli action that eliminated the command staff of the Al-Quds force in Syria.
  • The reasons for and against Israel’s counterattack focus on deterrence, a concept measured behaviorally. Those favoring an immediate response contend that without it, Israeli deterrence would be weakened, while those opposing it contend that the very nature of the Israeli defense was a loss for Iran.
  • The question of deterrence ignores the fact that the Iranian attack was specifically designed, from their point of view, to create deterrence against Israel – to dissuade Israel from future attacks against Iranian figures and assets.
  • The real question is whether or not the Iranian attack will succeed in its purpose and reduce the probability of future Israeli military behavior. Psychologically, deterrence is measured by subsequent behavior.
  • Continued Israeli actions that target Iran inside and outside of Iran will be evidence that Iran failed to achieve deterrence with its current attack.
  • The focus on a future Iranian attack rather than future Israeli actions to weaken Iran misses the point in the big picture for Israel. The measure of Israeli success in thwarting the Iranian attack is whether or not Israel will continue to pursue its current military policy against Iran. Considering the success of Israel in its defensive stance, any future Iranian actions in response to Israeli initiatives should be viewed as a failure in Iran’s stated goal of deterrence, viz. Israel.
  • Likewise, the ability of Israel to defend against Iranian counterattacks allows it to continue to deter Iran from its military and political goals against Israel.

Discussions following the Iranian attack on Israel during the early morning hours of April 14, 2024, focus on whether or not Israel will respond. This is clearly a conceptual issue, with those favoring an immediate response considering it necessary to preserve Israel’s deterrence1 and those preferring a vaguer response seeing it differently.2

The Iranian attack was not a surprise. Iran’s supreme leader called for it on several occasions. It was stated to be “punishment”3 for Israel’s presumed bombing of a complex adjacent to Iran’s consulate in Damascus that killed several Al-Quds force commanders.4

Conceptually, Iran’s behavior is a “response” to an Israeli initiative and, as such, is best described as a “counterattack “rather than an “attack.” This counterattack was clearly meant to “send a message” to Israel and was “…aimed at strengthening Iran’s deterrence,” viz. Israel. 5

The concept of “deterrence” is operationally defined in a NATO review as “…the threat of force to discourage an opponent from taking an unwelcome action.” 6 While Iran’s action was an attempt to deter Israel from future attacks against its personnel and assets, what should Israel’s goals be in the wake of Iran’s actions?

Israeli actions against Iran were first intended to deter Iranian actions that were part of their strategy to weaken Israel. Judging by the nature of the Iranian counterattack, this apparently was successful and pushed Iran into a position where it had to react. While Israel would want to reduce the probability of Iranian counterattacks, it is far more strategically important to continue targeting Iranian assets in the future. Should Israel continue this policy, the Iranian counterattack would not have achieved its goal.

Arab media have mocked Iran’s failure to penetrate Israel’s air defenses7 and indicated that the omnipotent perception it tried to present was not successful.

Cartoon
Iranian missile launches as viewed by Arab social media.

The paradigm of “response” that some Israeli officials are calling for8 assumes that the goal of Israeli strategy is to prevent Iranian counterattacks, when, in fact, the goal is to avoid initial attacks. Responding to a counterattack with the goal of reducing an Iranian response will only be effective if Iran loses motivation in the future to respond to Israeli military initiatives. The likelihood of that occurring is a matter of understanding and gauging Iranian thinking.

The true test of Iran’s counterattack will be whether it succeeds in deterring Israel from future initiatives against Iranian assets. The most effective response to the Iranian counterattack would appear to be continuing adherence to a policy that clearly struck a nerve in the Iranian political leadership.

So long as Israel can defend itself against future Iranian retaliatory actions effectively, continuing its strategy of initiating preventive deterrence against Iranian interests, as it has done until now, seems sound.

Reports indicated that the United States did not oppose the actual Israeli strike against Iranian commanders in Damascus but rather was upset that notice wasn’t given to allow for defensive measures to be taken.9 In fact, in expressing concern over the lack of notice, Defense Secretary Austin was quoted as saying that he “reiterated U.S. support for Israel’s defense against a range of regional threats.” 10

Toward that goal, it may be in Israel’s interests to strengthen and reinforce the regional alliance that supported Israel during Iran’s counterattack and refrain from actions that may be interpreted as “retaliatory” on Iranian territory. Simultaneously, continuing undeterred to pursue operations targeting Iranian interests, as supported by Israeli allies, would make operational sense and counter Iran’s goal of preventing Israeli action. Moreover, it would be a critical element in the more important goal of creating a coalition that would decisively end Iran’s nuclear ambitions and hopefully bring about regime change in Iran.

* * *

Notes

  1. https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/388468↩︎

  2. https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2024-04-14/ty-article-live/.premium/350-missiles-drones-launched-at-israel-in-irans-attack-un-to-convene-emergency-meeting/0000018e-dac5-d548-abef-ffffb2ae0000↩︎

  3. https://www.nbcnews.com/video/iran-s-supreme-leader-pledges-punishment-for-israel-208691269662↩︎

  4. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/01/world/middleeast/iran-commanders-killed-syria-israel.html↩︎

  5. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/4/14/true-promise-why-and-how-did-iran-launch-a-historic-attack-on-israel#:~:text=The%20attack%20was%20a%20direct,along%20with%20six%20other%20people.↩︎

  6. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2015/04/20/deterrence-what-it-can-and-cannot-do/index.html↩︎

  7. https://www.memri.org/reports/arab-commentators-social-media-irans-drone-attack-israel-was-planned-and-agreed-upon-iran↩︎

  8. https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/culture-and-sport-minister-zohar-slams-weak-outdated-response-to-iranian-attack/↩︎

  9. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/04/11/israel-damascus-strike-iran/↩︎

  10. Ibid↩︎

Dr. Irwin J. Mansdorf

Irwin J. (Yitzchak) Mansdorf, PhD., is a clinical psychologist and a fellow at the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs specializing in political psychology.
Share this

Subscribe to Daily Alert

The Daily Alert – Israel news digest appears every Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday.

Related Items

Stay Informed, Always

Get the latest news, insights, and updates directly in your inbox—be the first to know!

Subscribe to Jerusalem Issue Briefs
The Daily Alert – Israel news digest appears every Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday.







Notifications

The Jerusalem Center
What makes a child believe killing a #Jew is justified?

In PA textbooks, Jews are called liars and frauds; their fate: elimination. This is #indoctrination—not #education. But change is happening. On East to West, @IMPACT_SE CEO Marcus Sheff exposes how #UNRWA-funded schools are fueling extremism—and what real reform looks like.  Listen now on Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/2JHqh973U  Watch on YouTube: youtu.be/8OkJTGNfVUc

11:43am
The Jerusalem Center
Highlights from the @Jerusalem_Post Annual Conference in NYC:

Dr. @Dan_Diker, President of the JCFA: “October 7 wasn’t just an attack on Israel — it was a blow to the U.S. on Israeli soil. It demands moral clarity and a united front between Israel and the U.S. to defeat jihadist terror.”

2:20pm
The Jerusalem Center
@XAVIAERD says it like it is

Well, @XAVIAERD says it like it is: If you’re part of “#Queers for #Palestine,” he’ll pay for your flight to #Gaza. Go see for yourself how they treat LGBTQ+ people over there. Don’t miss this bold take on the Israel-Hamas war and the woke right.

2:32pm
The Jerusalem Center
“This isn’t Israel vs. Hamas — it’s the frontline of the free world.”

“This isn’t Israel vs. Hamas — it’s the frontline of the free world.” On Our Middle East by @JNS_org, @Dan_Diker@KhaledAbuToameh (JCFA/@GatestoneInst) break it down: If Hamas isn’t crushed, Iran wins. The jihadis—from #Gaza to your campus—get the green light. Diker: “This war is for the West.” No fluff. No filters. Just raw insight from two insiders who actually know what’s going on.  Watch: youtu.be/4Aq_zcbb4Yo

2:15pm
The Jerusalem Center
5/5 Lt. Col. Kalo on East to West with @smartinezamir:

“This operation showcases Israel’s strategic intelligence superiority both regionally and globally. It demonstrates the moral commitment to recovered soldiers and also strengthens Israel’s position with allies.” youtube.com/watch?v=nIvNNi

2:07pm
The Jerusalem Center
4/5 The operation built on intelligence gathered during the 2019 #Baumel recovery

#Mossad agents operated under cover in #Syria for years, visiting a graveyard multiple times under fire to collect remains for DNA matching. The intelligence community’s evolution combines technology, big data analysis, and human intelligence capabilities.

2:02pm
The Jerusalem Center
3/5 This recovery coincided with the release of Israeli hostage Edan Alexander

This recovery coincided with the release of Israeli hostage Edan Alexander from #Hamas in #Gaza, significantly boosting national morale amid an ongoing conflict now stretching over 18 months. The dual successes demonstrate #Israel‘s unwavering commitment to bringing all soldiers home.

1:58pm
The Jerusalem Center
2/5 The operation used the power vacuum following #Assad’s fall from #Damascus

Lt. Col. Avi Kalo, former head of IDF Prisoners & Missing Persons Division, calls it “an outstanding event that brings hope and new spirit to the people of Israel.” The operation utilized the power vacuum following #Assad‘s fall from #Damascus, allowing #Israeli intelligence to deploy ground capabilities in #Syria.

1:56pm
The Jerusalem Center
1/5 Israeli forces recovered the remains of Sergeant First Class Zvi Feldman

In an unprecedented operation, Israeli forces have recovered the remains of Sergeant First Class Zvi #Feldman, missing since the 1982 Battle of Sultan Yacoub. The complex #Mossad mission was conducted deep within #Syrian territory, 43 years after his disappearance. This follows the successful 2019 recovery of Zachary #Baumel from the same battle.

1:54pm
The Jerusalem Center
A molotov attack on a bus = a “barbecue party”?

That’s what #Palestinian kids are being taught under @UNRWA  — from grade school to graduation. This isn’t education. It’s indoctrination. Marcus Sheff of @IMPACT_SE  breaks it down with @smartinezamir

12:51pm

Close