Skip to content
עברית
Français
Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs (JCFA)
Strategic Alliances for a Secure, Connected, and Prosperous Region
Menu
Home
About Us
About Us
Our Experts
Board of Fellows
Our Building
Programs
The JCFA Center for Security, Diplomacy, and Communications
Arab-Israel-Africa National Security Partnerships
Initiative for Palestinian Authority Accountability and Reform
Exposing Political Antisemitism and Combating Delegitimization
Black American-Israel Leadership Initiative
Institute for Contemporary Affairs
For Students and Interns
Past Programs
Defensible Borders for Israel
Jerusalem in International Diplomacy
Anti-Semitism in Canada
Publications
Authors
Major Studies
Analysis
Jerusalem Issue Briefs
Jerusalem Viewpoints
Strategic Perspectives
Global Law Forum
Special Reports
Daily Alert
Jewish Political Studies Review
Post-Holocaust and Anti-Semitism
Daniel Elazar Library
Major Knesset Debates
Israel’s Wars
Maps
Jewish Environmental Studies
Survey of Arab Affairs
Jerusalem Letter
Homeland Security Portal
Jerusalem Studies
ebooks
Other Special Features
Podcast
Videos
New Videos
YouTube
Audio Archive
Conferences
Blog
Support Us
Contact Us
Search for:
Home
Current:
Response
Response
A Disproportionate Response? The Case of Israel and Hizballah
December 1, 2006 |
Joshua L. Gleis
In responding forcefully to Hizballah’s provocation in the summer of 2006, Israel not only restored much of its deterrent capability, but did so against a weapon of the Iranian and Syrian militaries. Israel acted only after exhausting a number of other options over the decades, including everything from all-out invasion and regime change to quiet diplomacy and open negotiations. Israel’s overall response was not disproportionate when considering the enemy Israel was fighting.