Skip to content
עברית
Français
Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs (JCFA)
Strategic Alliances for a Secure, Connected, and Prosperous Region
Menu
Home
About Us
About Us
Our Experts
Board of Fellows
Our Building
Programs
The JCFA Center for Security, Diplomacy, and Communications
Arab-Israel-Africa National Security Partnerships
Initiative for Palestinian Authority Accountability and Reform
Exposing Political Antisemitism and Combating Delegitimization
Black American-Israel Leadership Initiative
Institute for Contemporary Affairs
For Students and Interns
Past Programs
Defensible Borders for Israel
Jerusalem in International Diplomacy
Anti-Semitism in Canada
Publications
Authors
Major Studies
Analysis
Jerusalem Issue Briefs
Jerusalem Viewpoints
Strategic Perspectives
Global Law Forum
Special Reports
Daily Alert
Jewish Political Studies Review
Post-Holocaust and Anti-Semitism
Daniel Elazar Library
Major Knesset Debates
Israel’s Wars
Maps
Jewish Environmental Studies
Survey of Arab Affairs
Jerusalem Letter
Homeland Security Portal
Jerusalem Studies
ebooks
Other Special Features
Videos
New Videos
YouTube
Audio Archive
Conferences
Blog
Support Us
Contact Us
Search for:
Home
Current:
King David
King David
King David and Uriah the Hittite in the Political Thought of Thomas Hobbes by Thomas S. Schrock
October 27, 1992
The most neglected aspect of Hobbes's attempt to solve the theological political problem is his reliance on divine punishment of the iniquitous sovereign. By turning that matter exclusively over to God or? what comes to the same thing? by immunizing such a sovereign against accountability to his subjects, Hobbes radicalizes a Christian motif and fragments what for Aristotle had been an integral political whole. This essay is about that fragmentation, with special attention to the text in which Hobbes makes his intention partially clear? his discussion of King David's murder of Uriah the Hittite.
The Bible and Intra-Jewish Politics: Early Rabbinic Portraits of King David
April 2, 1991
This essay explores some of the concerns which might have influenced early rabbinic reconstructions of the private life and public career of King David. David and his monarchy were treated as vehicles for constitutional polemic, transposed into symbols of a particular type of ruler and regime. Three specific instances recorded in the Babylonian Talmud which lend themselves to political interpretation are discussed. When linked to allied early rabbinic dicta on the exercise and distribution of political power, they illustrate separate facets of what appears to have been an integrated constitutional doctrine. That doctrine is outlined and the purposes to which it was put are demonstrated.