Skip to content
עברית
Français
Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs (JCFA)
Strategic Alliances for a Secure, Connected, and Prosperous Region
Menu
Home
About Us
About Us
Our Experts
Board of Fellows
Our Building
Programs
The JCFA Center for Security, Diplomacy, and Communications
Arab-Israel-Africa National Security Partnerships
Initiative for Palestinian Authority Accountability and Reform
Exposing Political Antisemitism and Combating Delegitimization
Black American-Israel Leadership Initiative
Institute for Contemporary Affairs
For Students and Interns
Past Programs
Defensible Borders for Israel
Jerusalem in International Diplomacy
Anti-Semitism in Canada
Publications
Authors
Major Studies
Analysis
Jerusalem Issue Briefs
Jerusalem Viewpoints
Strategic Perspectives
Global Law Forum
Special Reports
Daily Alert
Jewish Political Studies Review
Post-Holocaust and Anti-Semitism
Daniel Elazar Library
Major Knesset Debates
Israel’s Wars
Maps
Jewish Environmental Studies
Survey of Arab Affairs
Jerusalem Letter
Homeland Security Portal
Jerusalem Studies
ebooks
Other Special Features
Videos
New Videos
YouTube
Audio Archive
Conferences
Blog
Support Us
Contact Us
Search for:
Home
Current:
global jewry
global jewry
Reconciling Power and Equality in International Organizations: A Voting Method from Rabbi Krochmal of Kremsier
October 30, 2000 |
Barry ONeill
,
Bezalel Peleg
Organizations whose members are national governments face a problem in their choice of a voting mechanism: they need systems that recognize the greater power and contribution of the larger members while preserving some influence for the smaller ones. Voting by count and account is suggested here as providing a good compromise between power and equality. It avoids certain surprising and counterintuitive results produced by other systems that international bodies now use, such as basic votes. At the organization's founding it is easy to negotiate and it also symbolizes the accepted status relationships in an international body better than current methods do, thus giving a vote more legitimacy.
The Social, Cultural and Political Impact of Zionism in Libya (Research Note)
October 25, 1994
The development of the Zionist movement in Libya was an evolutionary process which brought changes in ways of thinking and behavior without detaching completely from tradition. New social and economic elements entered public life (lower middle class and women) and changes took place in education (modern Hebrew language and literature and modern Jewish history). This is not to say, however, that those social elements did not have any part in public life beforehand, but now their involvement became a mainstream one. Similarly, traditional education did not cease, and the old political guard continued to exist: the official communal leadership was manned by it, and Zionist leaders were observant Jews who were backed by many rabbis. Despite the growing involvement of women, they hardly reached leadership positions. The impact of the Zionists.
The United States and the Middle East: A Global View
April 22, 1982 |
Daniel J. Elazar