Alerts

Former Israeli Chief Justice Meir Shamgar: The Right Man in the Right Place at the Right Time

Meir Shamgar played a unique role in molding Israel’s legal system as well as Israel’s status in the administered areas.
Share this
Meir Shamgar
(Kobi Gideon/GPO)

Table of Contents

Vol. 19, No. 18

  • Israel’s former Chief Justice Meir Shamgar, who died on Oct. 18 at age 94, played a unique role in molding Israel’s legal system as well as Israel’s status in the administered areas. As the Military Advocate General in the 1960s, he designed and built the legal and the command structure that served as the basis for Israel’s administration of the territories following the Six-Day War and up to the present.
  • Following the Six-Day War and Israel’s attaining control of Judea, Samaria, and Gaza, Shamgar was faced with a melange of unique legal and military realities, as well as an area steeped in historic Jewish heritage. Shamgar was well aware that this was not a simple classic situation of belligerent occupation of the land of a sovereign state.
  • Jordan was not considered as having sovereign rights over Judea and Samaria (the West Bank) following its unrecognized annexation of the area in 1950, and Egypt had never claimed sovereign rights over Gaza. Hence, such a special and irregular legal situation called for creative and original thinking in order to devise the appropriate legal framework and status of the territory.
  • On top of these circumstances lay the unique legal and historic background of the area in which claims of indigenous, historic, and legal rights of the Jewish people – as recognized in the 1917 Balfour Declaration and subsequently incorporated into instruments of international law – were at the foundation of the status of the land.
  • In a 1971 article dealing with the application of international law in the administered areas, Shamgar set out the reasoning for his determination that the territories are not simply “occupied territories” but better and more accurately defined as “administered areas.” Based on Shamgar’s legal construction, Israel distinguished between the unique status of the territory and Israel’s humanitarian obligations vis-a-vis the local population emanating from the applicable international humanitarian norms.
  • At the behest of Shamgar, Israel provided the local population with full and unprecedented access to its Supreme Court, as a means of ensuring that the Israeli military and governmental authorities functioning in the territories duly observe the Fourth Geneva Convention’s humanitarian provisions.

The passing of Israel’s former Chief Justice Meir Shamgar, who died on Oct. 18, 2019, at age 94, in addition to being seen as a sad loss to Israel’s legal world, appears to have released an outpouring of emotions from all directions of the Israeli political and legal spectrum. Such sentiments, including some biting criticism, relate to his unique role in, and contribution to, molding Israel’s legal system as well as Israel’s status in the administered areas.

Clearly, someone who served as the legal adviser to Israel’s Ministry of Defense, and then as Israel’s Military Advocate General, and then as its Attorney General, followed by his appointment as a Supreme Court justice, and ultimately as Chief Justice – made a considerable mark on Israel’s legal system in each of those spheres.

But even on this occasion of his passing, various politically-driven elements could not miss the opportunity to utilize the occasion to blame Shamgar for all Israel’s troubles, as the Military Advocate General who, in the 1960s designed and built the legal and the command structure that served as the basis for Israel’s administration of the territories following the Six-Day War and up to the present.

These same elements, incessantly plying their unidirectional political agendas, have not missed the opportunity to advance their fixation against Israel’s continued presence in, and administration of, the territories.

It is indeed sad that even in their eulogies for such a great jurist, they could not resist injecting skepticism and even negativity, demonstrating an element of partisan-political short-sightedness and limited vision.

Examples of such short-sightedness include the following op-ed pieces in various newspapers:

…one also cannot avoid noting Shamgar’s contribution to the normalization of the Israeli occupation. In his various roles, he gave the stamp of approval to actions that enabled the state and the defense establishment to continue controlling the occupied Palestinian population and its land while depriving them of their basic rights, as individuals and as a people.1

He prepared the legal and command system for the possibility of military control over occupied territories. Only exceptional individuals have his ability to foresee and to prepare the governmental system under his command of future possibilities, even if it seemed then to be almost fictional.2

…If it weren’t for his contribution, perhaps the occupation would not have extended for so long. If it weren’t for the justification that he gave it, perhaps the crime would have been eradicated a long time ago. In Ariel and Itamar, they should call streets after him. From Jenin to Rafah they should remember him with disgrace. Shamgar was the silver platter upon which the occupation was delivered to Israel and the world.3

…In practice, the definition [“administered areas”] has created legal and planning chaos from which the settlement movement has not recovered.4

The Jerusalem Post also remarked that “Shamgar’s ideas, embodied by a series of IDF military orders issued soon after the IDF took over the West Bank, have dominated the Israeli debate for the 50 years since then, certainly up until the Settlements Regulation Law passed in February [2017].”5

Indeed, Shamgar, as the Military Advocate-General during the 1960s, found himself at a unique and historic juncture, following the Six-Day War and Israel’s attaining control of the areas of Judea, Samaria, and the Gaza Strip. He was both faced with a mélange of sui generis legal and military realities, as well as an area steeped in historic Jewish heritage.

As regards the legal status of the territory, Shamgar the jurist was well aware of the fact that this was not a simple classic situation of belligerent occupation of the land of a sovereign state. In such situations international law, as set out in the 1907 Hague Rules of Land Warfare6 and the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention on the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War,7 prescribes clear norms of behavior between an occupier and the local population, on issues of property, law and basic rights, while protecting the territorial rights of the sovereign.

Shamgar was aware of the irregular situation, in which Jordan was not considered as having sovereign rights over the areas of Judea and Samaria following its unrecognized annexation of the areas in 1950, and in which Egypt had never claimed sovereign rights over the Gaza Strip area, where it had maintained a military administration.

Hence, such a special and irregular legal situation called for creative and original thinking in order to devise the appropriate legal framework and status of the territory.

On top of these circumstances lay the unique legal and historic background of the area in which claims of indigenous, historic, and legal rights of the Jewish people – as recognized in the 1917 Balfour Declaration and subsequently incorporated into instruments of international law – were at the foundation of the status of the land.

In a 1971 article dealing with the application of international law in the administered areas, Shamgar set out the reasoning for his determination that the territories are not simply “occupied territories” but better and more accurately defined as “administered areas under belligerent occupation.”

The territorial position is … sui generis, and the Israeli government tried therefore to distinguish between theoretical juridical and political problems on the one hand, and the observance of the humanitarian provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention on the other hand. Accordingly the government distinguished between the legal problems of the applicability of the Fourth Convention to the territories under consideration which, as stated, does not in my opinion apply to these territories, and decided to act de facto, in accordance with the humanitarian provisions of the convention.8

As such, based on Shamgar’s legal construction, Israel distinguished between the unique sui-generis status of the territory emanating from its special historic and legal circumstances, on the one hand, and Israel’s humanitarian obligations vis-à-vis the local population emanating from the applicable international humanitarian norms, on the other.

Israel’s military proclamations and orders, issued upon entering the territories in June 1967, stressed the premise that Israel was acting in accordance with accepted norms of international law as set out in the 1949 Geneva Conventions, regarding property, respect for local law and other general matters.9  

At the same time, and without accepting the formal application of the Fourth Geneva Convention to the territories, implying recognition of Jordanian sovereignty, Israel nevertheless undertook to apply the humanitarian provisions of that convention to the local population. In this context, Israel cooperated with the ICRC in enabling it to assist the local population, pursuant to the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Similarly, at the behest of Shamgar, Israel provided the local population with full and unprecedented access to its Supreme Court, as a means of ensuring that the Israeli military and governmental authorities functioning in the territories duly observe the convention’s humanitarian provisions.10

Shamgar’s special ability enabled him to collate, at a most critical juncture in the area’s history, all the various legal, military considerations, and to construct a framework that, on the one hand, made no irreversible legal or political determinations regarding the permanent status of the territory. Yet, at the same time, left all these issues open for a subsequent peace-negotiation process. This enabled all parties to accept UN Security Council Resolution 242 (1967)11 as the basis for a peace negotiation process that continues up to the present day.

Shamgar was, indeed, the right man in the right place, at the right time.

* * *

Notes

1 Editorial, “Justice Meir Shamgar’s Legacy,” Ha’aretz, Oct. 20, 2019, https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/editorial/justice-meir-shamgar-s-legacy-1.8009633

2 Mordechai Kremnitzer, Ha’aretz, Oct. 18, 2019 (Hebrew),  https://www.haaretz.co.il/news/law/.premium-1.8006816

3 Gideon Levy, “Forefather of the ‘Administered Territories’,” Ha’aretz, Oct. 20, 2019, https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-forefather-of-the-administered-territories-1.8009353

4 Yehuda Yifrach, Makor Rishon, Oct. 24, 2019 (Hebrew), https://www.makorrishon.co.il/news/yoman/179217/

5 Yonah Jeremy Bob, “50 Years since 1967: What Is the West Bank’s Real Legal Status?” Jerusalem Post, https://www.jpost.com/Magazine/50-years-of-law-versus-reality-493859

6 https://www.loc.gov/law/help/us-treaties/bevans/m-ust000001-0631.pdf

7 https://ihl‑databases.icrc.org/ihl/385ec082b509e76c41256739003e636d/6756482d86146898c125641e004aa3c5

8 Meir Shamgar, “The Observance of International Law in the Administered Territories,” 1 Israel Yearbook on Human Rights (1971), p. 266.

9 IDF West Bank Force Commander’s Proclamations Nos. 2 and 3 dated June 7, 1967 and the Order Concerning Security Regulations, http://nolegalfrontiers.org/military-orders/mil039ed2.html?lang=en

10 See High Court of Justice (HCJ), Beit Sourik Village Council v. Government of Israel, HCJ 2056/04, Judgement, available at: http://elyon1.court.gov.il/Files_ENG/04/560/020/A28/04020560.A28.pdf; Mariabe v Prime Minister of Israel, HCJ 7957/04, Judgement, available at: http://elyon1.court.gov.il/Files_ENG/04/570/079/A14/04079570.A14.pdf. http://www.hamoked.org.il/Document.aspx?dID=Documents1548

11 https://mfa.gov.il/mfa/foreignpolicy/peace/guide/pages/un%20security%20council%20resolution%20242.aspx

Amb. Alan Baker

Amb. Alan Baker is Director of the Institute for Contemporary Affairs at the Jerusalem Center and the head of the Global Law Forum. He participated in the negotiation and drafting of the Oslo Accords with the Palestinians, as well as agreements and peace treaties with Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon. He served as legal adviser and deputy director-general of Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and as Israel’s ambassador to Canada.
Share this

Subscribe to Daily Alert

The Daily Alert – Israel news digest appears every Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday.

Related Items

Stay Informed, Always

Get the latest news, insights, and updates directly in your inbox—be the first to know!

Subscribe to Jerusalem Issue Briefs
The Daily Alert – Israel news digest appears every Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday.







Notifications

The Jerusalem Center
What makes a child believe killing a #Jew is justified?

In PA textbooks, Jews are called liars and frauds; their fate: elimination. This is #indoctrination—not #education. But change is happening. On East to West, @IMPACT_SE CEO Marcus Sheff exposes how #UNRWA-funded schools are fueling extremism—and what real reform looks like.  Listen now on Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/2JHqh973U  Watch on YouTube: youtu.be/8OkJTGNfVUc

11:43am
The Jerusalem Center
Highlights from the @Jerusalem_Post Annual Conference in NYC:

Dr. @Dan_Diker, President of the JCFA: “October 7 wasn’t just an attack on Israel — it was a blow to the U.S. on Israeli soil. It demands moral clarity and a united front between Israel and the U.S. to defeat jihadist terror.”

2:20pm
The Jerusalem Center
@XAVIAERD says it like it is

Well, @XAVIAERD says it like it is: If you’re part of “#Queers for #Palestine,” he’ll pay for your flight to #Gaza. Go see for yourself how they treat LGBTQ+ people over there. Don’t miss this bold take on the Israel-Hamas war and the woke right.

2:32pm
The Jerusalem Center
“This isn’t Israel vs. Hamas — it’s the frontline of the free world.”

“This isn’t Israel vs. Hamas — it’s the frontline of the free world.” On Our Middle East by @JNS_org, @Dan_Diker@KhaledAbuToameh (JCFA/@GatestoneInst) break it down: If Hamas isn’t crushed, Iran wins. The jihadis—from #Gaza to your campus—get the green light. Diker: “This war is for the West.” No fluff. No filters. Just raw insight from two insiders who actually know what’s going on.  Watch: youtu.be/4Aq_zcbb4Yo

2:15pm
The Jerusalem Center
5/5 Lt. Col. Kalo on East to West with @smartinezamir:

“This operation showcases Israel’s strategic intelligence superiority both regionally and globally. It demonstrates the moral commitment to recovered soldiers and also strengthens Israel’s position with allies.” youtube.com/watch?v=nIvNNi

2:07pm
The Jerusalem Center
4/5 The operation built on intelligence gathered during the 2019 #Baumel recovery

#Mossad agents operated under cover in #Syria for years, visiting a graveyard multiple times under fire to collect remains for DNA matching. The intelligence community’s evolution combines technology, big data analysis, and human intelligence capabilities.

2:02pm
The Jerusalem Center
3/5 This recovery coincided with the release of Israeli hostage Edan Alexander

This recovery coincided with the release of Israeli hostage Edan Alexander from #Hamas in #Gaza, significantly boosting national morale amid an ongoing conflict now stretching over 18 months. The dual successes demonstrate #Israel‘s unwavering commitment to bringing all soldiers home.

1:58pm
The Jerusalem Center
2/5 The operation used the power vacuum following #Assad’s fall from #Damascus

Lt. Col. Avi Kalo, former head of IDF Prisoners & Missing Persons Division, calls it “an outstanding event that brings hope and new spirit to the people of Israel.” The operation utilized the power vacuum following #Assad‘s fall from #Damascus, allowing #Israeli intelligence to deploy ground capabilities in #Syria.

1:56pm
The Jerusalem Center
1/5 Israeli forces recovered the remains of Sergeant First Class Zvi Feldman

In an unprecedented operation, Israeli forces have recovered the remains of Sergeant First Class Zvi #Feldman, missing since the 1982 Battle of Sultan Yacoub. The complex #Mossad mission was conducted deep within #Syrian territory, 43 years after his disappearance. This follows the successful 2019 recovery of Zachary #Baumel from the same battle.

1:54pm
The Jerusalem Center
A molotov attack on a bus = a “barbecue party”?

That’s what #Palestinian kids are being taught under @UNRWA  — from grade school to graduation. This isn’t education. It’s indoctrination. Marcus Sheff of @IMPACT_SE  breaks it down with @smartinezamir

12:51pm

Close